【24h】

Spatiotemporal change of ecological capacity of Lancang River Valley in Yunnan Province

机译:云南澜沧江流域生态容量的时空变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Lancang River Valley has a complicated geographical context, rich biological resources, frangible eco-environment and intensive human disturbance. In this region, there are great differences between ecological security level and ecological capacity. Analyzing the spatiotemporal changes of ecological capacity is important for government to manage the development of Lancang River Valley. In a case study of each county in the region, we used the method of ecological footprint to study spatiotemporal change of ecological capacity in different period. We compared the values of ecological capacity with that calculated by the theory of net primary productivity (NPP for short) in order to analyze the differences between two methods. The results showed as follow: (1) Ecological capacity of Lancang River Valley reduced year by year. (2) Ecological capacity had a negative correlation with population density. But its pattern of distributing was consistent with that of ecological capacity. (3) Ecological capacity Calculated by NPP increased gradually from north to south. Comparing with two methods, ecological capacity calculated by NPP was considered as maximum capacity in theoretical, and that by ecological footprint as real value.
机译:澜沧江流域地理环境复杂,生物资源丰富,生态环境脆弱,人为干扰严重。在该地区,生态安全水平和生态能力之间存在很大差异。分析生态容量的时空变化对政府管理澜沧江流域的发展具有重要意义。在该地区每个县的个案研究中,我们使用生态足迹方法研究了不同时期的生态容量的时空变化。为了比较两种方法之间的差异,我们将生态承载力的值与通过净初级生产力理论(简称NPP)计算的值进行了比较。结果表明:(1)澜沧江流域的生态承载力逐年降低。 (2)生态能力与人口密度呈负相关。但其分布方式与生态能力相一致。 (3)NPP计算的生态承载力从北向南逐渐增加。与两种方法相比,理论上认为以核电厂计算的生态容量为最大容量,以生态足迹计算的生态容量为实际值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号