首页> 外文会议>Biennial International Pipeline Conference(IPC 2004) vol.3; 20041004-08; Calgary(CA) >A DISCUSSION ON HOW INTERNAL PRESSURE IS TREATED IN OFFSHORE PIPELINE DESIGN
【24h】

A DISCUSSION ON HOW INTERNAL PRESSURE IS TREATED IN OFFSHORE PIPELINE DESIGN

机译:海上管道设计中如何处理内部压力的讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The design of rigid submarine pipelines has been the object of extensive research work over the last few years, where the most relevant issues include upheaval and lateral buckling problems. Both of these problems systematically associate temperature and pressure loads, where the treatment of the first is obvious, while the latter have always been a matter of discussion. In 1974 Palmer and Baldry presented a theoretical-experimental contribution, in which they have set a pattern that has been followed ever since. Another similar and well known paper was published by Sparks in 1983 , who only present a physical interpretation of this same theory. Most of the present day industry codes define an effective axial force, according to which, fixed end pipelines will be under compression due to internal pressure. The starting point of the discussion presented in [1] was that internal pressure produces a lateral force, which is numerically equal to the pressure times internal cross-sectional area times the pipeline curvature: q=p.Ai.d~2y/dx~2 (1) This equation is demonstrated further ahead in this paper. Palmer and Baldry then based their arguments on the traditional equation of the pinned column buckling problem, studied by Euler: EId~4y/dx~4 + Pd~2y/dx~2 = 0 (2) for which the well known solution is: P = π~2EI/L~2 (3) and on the associated problem studied by Timoshenko, which adds a distributed lateral load q to the same problem: EId~4y/dx~4 + Pd~2y/dx~2 = q (4) Replacing q with the lateral pressure given above, they were able to have their own problem fall back onto the Euler solution: EId~4y/dx~4 + Pd~2y/dx~2 = p.Ai.d~2y/dx~2 P-pAi = π~2EI/L~2 (5) After correcting for the Poisson effect they were able to determine the new critical axial force caused by the pressure. Unfortunately, however, the arguments set forth in [1] have been misunderstood. The fact that both axial force and lateral force multiply curvature does not make them forces of the same nature. Being able to add them has solved a mathematical equation, but still hasn't converted the lateral force to axial. The authors wish to prove that presents no more than a tool, which can be used in the analysis of global buckling problems of pipelines subject to both temperature and pressure. It will be shown, however, that this pressure will not produce an axial force, as now-a-days prescribed conservatively in many pipeline codes, which is even used for stress checking.
机译:在过去的几年中,刚性海底管道的设计一直是广泛研究工作的目标,其中最相关的问题包括动荡和横向屈曲问题。这两个问题都系统地关联了温度和压力负载,前者的处理很明显,而后者一直是讨论的问题。 1974年,Palmer和Baldry提出了一项理论上的实验性贡献,树立了自那时以来遵循的模式。斯帕克斯(Sparks)在1983年发表了另一篇相似且众所周知的论文,该论文仅对这一理论进行了物理解释。当今大多数行业规范都定义了有效轴向力,根据该轴向力,固定端管道将由于内部压力而处于压缩状态。 [1]中讨论的出发点是内部压力产生横向力,其数值等于压力乘以内部截面积乘以管道曲率:q = p.Ai.d〜2y / dx〜 2(1)本文将在前面进一步证明该方程。然后,Palmer和Baldry基于Euler研究的固定柱屈曲问题的传统方程式作为论点:EId〜4y / dx〜4 + Pd〜2y / dx〜2 = 0(2),为此,众所周知的解决方案是: P =π〜2EI / L〜2(3)以及关于蒂莫申科研究的相关问题,该问题将分布侧向载荷q添加到同一问题上:EId〜4y / dx〜4 + Pd〜2y / dx〜2 = q (4)用上面给出的侧向压力代替q,他们就有了自己的问题可以归结为Euler解:EId〜4y / dx〜4 + Pd〜2y / dx〜2 = p.Ai.d〜2y / dx〜2 P-pAi =π〜2EI / L〜2(5)校正了泊松效应后,他们能够确定由压力引起的新的临界轴向力。然而不幸的是,[1]中提出的论点被误解了。轴向力和横向力都使曲率倍增这一事实并不能使它们具有相同的性质。能够添加它们解决了一个数学方程式,但尚未将横向力转换为轴向力。作者希望证明,本文提供的只是一种工具,可用于分析受温度和压力影响的管道的整体屈曲问题。然而,将显示出,该压力不会产生轴向力,正如当今许多管道规范中保守规定的那样,甚至用于应力检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号