【24h】

REGULATORY PROCESS CHANGES AT THE OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY

机译:管道安全办公室的监管程序发生了变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the past several years the Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) in the Research and Special Programs Administration of the US Department of Transportation has begun to develop and implement a different approach to structuring its regulations and to carrying out the inspections it uses to evaluate operator conformance with the provisions of these regulations. Several new Rules have been promulgated incorporating provisions that are a combination of prescriptive, performance-based, and management-based. These rules include the hazardous liquid integrity management rules for large and small operators, the operator qualification rule, and the gas integrity management rule. The new rules have been designed to allow operators flexibility in their approach to addressing the objectives of the regulations. Such flexibility is needed because of the significant differences in the pipeline infrastructure operated by each company, and the corresponding need to acknowledge these differences to assure the objectives of regulation are achieved without imposing a needless and costly burden on the operators. Promulgation of highly prescriptive "one-size-fits-all" regulations is inconsistent with the variations present in the infrastructure operated by the US pipeline industry. One ingredient in the approach OPS has chosen is the imposition of "management-based" requirements. These requirements are so-called because they prescribe implementation of a program that includes the need for several management practices. The new rules allow some flexibility in which management practices are selected and exactly how they are implemented. Inspection against management-based provisions is different from inspection of purely prescriptive requirements. Management-based requirements provide flexibility in how operators evaluate, justify and change their practices to satisfy the intent of the rule within their unique operating environment. While such changes are designed to lead to improved performance, they will not immediately manifest themselves in recognizable changes in performance, so finely tuned measures of performance are needed to help evaluate the effectiveness of the new requirements. OPS has adopted several mechanisms to aid in the consistent inspection of the management-based provisions of the new rules. These mechanisms are discussed in the paper, as is the OPS approach to answering the question of how it will know if the new approach is working.
机译:在过去的几年中,美国运输部研究与特殊项目管理局的管道安全办公室(OPS)已开始开发和实施一种不同的方法来构建其法规并进行其用于评估运营商的检查符合本法规的规定。颁布了几项新规则,其中纳入了规定性,基于绩效和基于管理的规定。这些规则包括针对大型和小型操作员的危险液体完整性管理规则,操作员资格规则以及气体完整性管理规则。新规则旨在允许运营商灵活地解决法规目标。由于每个公司运营的管道基础设施存在显着差异,因此需要这种灵活性,并且需要认识到这些差异以确保实现监管目标,而又不会给运营商带来不必要和昂贵的负担。高度规范的“一刀切”法规的颁布与美国管道行业运营的基础设施中出现的变化不一致。 OPS选择的方法中的一个要素是强加“基于管理的”要求。之所以称为这些要求,是因为它们规定了程序的实施,其中包括对几种管理实践的需求。新规则为选择管理实践以及如何实现这些实践提供了一定的灵活性。根据基于管理的规定进行检查不同于仅对规定性要求进行检查。基于管理的要求提供了灵活性,使操作员可以在其独特的操作环境中评估,证明和更改其做法,从而满足规则的意图。尽管此类更改旨在提高性能,但它们不会立即以可识别的性能变化体现出来,因此需要对性能进行微调的措施以帮助评估新要求的有效性。 OPS采用了多种机制来帮助对新规则中基于管理的规定进行一致检查。本文讨论了这些机制,以及OPS回答如何知道新方法是否有效的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号