首页> 外文会议>Anaphora: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications; Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence; 4410 >An Empirical Investigation of the Relation Between Coreference and Quotations: Can a Pronoun Located in Quotations Find Its Referent?
【24h】

An Empirical Investigation of the Relation Between Coreference and Quotations: Can a Pronoun Located in Quotations Find Its Referent?

机译:对同指关系和报价之间关系的实证研究:位于报价中的代词能否找到其指涉对象?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many reference resolution studies omit anaphoric forms found in quotations, assuming that they may need special handling as there is insufficient discourse context to determine the referent. This paper reports on an empirical study performed to evaluate this assumption. Specifically, the study addresses the following questions: Are anaphoric expressions found in quotations sufficiently different to justify ignoring them, and is there enough context available for a system to determine the referents of anaphoric expressions found within quoted text? The current study focuses on the pronoun it within the Givenness Hierarchy framework of Gundel, Hedberg, and Zacharski [13]. We find that this framework can be used in most cases to locate the antecedent for referential it found in quoted text.
机译:许多参考解决方案研究都忽略了引号中的回指形式,假设它们可能需要特殊处理,因为话语语境不足以确定参考对象。本文报告了一项为评估此假设而进行的实证研究。具体而言,该研究解决了以下问题:引号中找到的回指表达方式是否足够不同,以至于可以忽略它们,并且系统是否有足够的上下文来确定引用的文本中的回指表示形式?当前的研究集中在Gundel,Hedberg和Zacharski [13]的Givenness层次结构框架内的代词。我们发现,在大多数情况下都可以使用此框架来找到引用文本的先行引用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号