【24h】

MADYMO SIMULATIONS OF OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE KINEMATICS IN OFFSET AND OBLIQUE BARRIER TESTS

机译:偏置和倾斜障碍测试中乘员和车辆运动学的运动学模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Oblique and offset impacts occur more frequently than full frontal impacts and the resulting occupant and vehicle kinematics are more complicated. Simulations of these test modes are more involved with added vehicle degrees of freedom. Additional occupant interactions with the vehicle interior need to be considered so that the occupant kinematics can be correlated more accurately. In order to capture the vehicle motion in an offset or oblique impact, a prescribed motion approach is preferred where the vehicle is given a three-dimensional motion with six degrees of freedom. With a planar motion assumption, the dominant angular motion about the vertical direction can be derived from linear accelerations measured at two locations where the vehicle deformation is a minimum. In a previous study the angular kinematics was given to a coordinate origin located on the vehicle centerline and longitudinally near the rear rocker. The instantaneous center of rotation was assumed to be fixed at this point during the event. This is referred to as Method Ⅰ in this paper. A new approach, referred to as Method Ⅱ, applied translational displacement to three bodies, which carried the passenger compartment through stiff spring elements. The displacements were integrated from measured accelerations, eliminating the uncertainty of a shifting center of rotation. Both methods assumed the vehicle frame between the front and rear rockers as a rigid body. The IP and steering column intrusions and floor deformations were neglected. The results from both methods were correlated to a pair of 40 kph 30 degree angle impact tests and an IIHS ODB test. Method Ⅱ showed a slightly better timing correlation for the angle tests and the IIHS ODB test. However, both methods didn't predict the lateral head contact for the driver in the left angle test and the passenger in the right angle test. More interior details have to be included in the model to capture the lateral motion of the occupants. The prescribed motion method is a more general approach than the commonly used inverse kinematics method, and can be applied to full frontal impact as well. The versatility of the method provides a basis for a modular approach in occupant simulations.
机译:倾斜和偏心的碰撞比正面的碰撞更频繁地发生,因此乘员和车辆的运动学更加复杂。这些测试模式的仿真更多地与增加的车辆自由度有关。需要考虑与乘员内部的其他乘员交互,以便可以更准确地关联乘员运动学。为了在偏移或倾斜的冲击中捕获车辆运动,在给定车辆具有六个自由度的三维运动的情况下,优选采用规定的运动方法。在平面运动假设的情况下,围绕垂直方向的主要角运动可以从在车辆变形最小的两个位置处测得的线性加速度中得出。在先前的研究中,将角度运动学赋予了位于车辆中心线上且纵向靠近后摇杆的坐标原点。在事件发生的这一点上,瞬时旋转中心被认为是固定的。在本文中将其称为方法Ⅰ。一种称为方法Ⅱ的新方法将平移位移应用于三个车身,这些车身通过刚性的弹簧元件将乘客车厢带入。位移是根据测量的加速度进行积分的,从而消除了旋转中心的不确定性。两种方法都假设前后摇臂之间的车架为刚体。 IP和转向柱的侵入和地板变形被忽略。两种方法的结果都与一对40 kph 30度角冲击试验和IIHS ODB试验相关。方法Ⅱ在角度测试和IIHS ODB测试中显示出更好的时序相关性。但是,两种方法都无法预测驾驶员在左角测试中和乘员在直角测试中的横向头部接触。模型中必须包含更多内部细节,以捕获乘员的横向运动。规定的运动方法是比常用的逆运动学方法更通用的方法,并且也可以应用于正面碰撞。该方法的多功能性为乘员模拟中的模块化方法提供了基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号