首页> 外文会议>Advances in Digital Forensics IV >WHEN IS DIGITAL EVIDENCE FORENSICALLY SOUND?
【24h】

WHEN IS DIGITAL EVIDENCE FORENSICALLY SOUND?

机译:数字证据何时被司法鉴定?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

"Forensically sound" is a term used extensively in the digital forensics community to qualify and, in some cases, to justify the use of a particular forensic technology or methodology. Indeed, many practitioners use the term when describing the capabilities of a particular piece of software or when describing a particular forensic analysis approach. Such a wide application of the term can only lead to confusion. This paper examines the various definitions of forensic computing (also called digital forensics) and identifies the common role that admissibility and evidentiary weight play. Using this common theme, the paper explores how the term "forensically sound" has been used and examines the drivers for using such a term. Finally, a definition of "forensically sound" is proposed and four criteria are provided for determining whether or not a digital forensic process may be considered to be "forensically sound."
机译:“法证健全”是数字法证学界广泛使用的一个术语,用于限定并在某些情况下证明使用特定法证技术或方法是合理的。实际上,许多从业人员在描述特定软件的功能或描述特定法证分析方法时会使用该术语。该术语的如此广泛的应用只会导致混乱。本文研究了法证计算的各种定义(也称为数字法证),并确定了可采性和证据权重发挥的共同作用。本文使用这个通用主题,探讨了术语“法医声音”的使用方式,并研究了使用该术语的驱动因素。最后,提出了“法医声音”的定义,并提供了四个标准来确定数字取证过程是否可以被视为“法医声音”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号