首页> 外文会议>A critical link: Diagnosis to prognosis >Investigation of main rotor spindle assembly retaining rods for an army utility helicopter fabricated by three different contractors
【24h】

Investigation of main rotor spindle assembly retaining rods for an army utility helicopter fabricated by three different contractors

机译:由三个不同承包商制造的军用直升机主旋翼主轴总成固定杆的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The US Army Research Laboratory (ARL) was tasked by the US Army Aviation and Troop Command (ATCOM) to perform a metallurgical examination of main rotor spindle assembly retaining rods fabricated from precipitation hardened (PH) 13-8 Mo stainless steel by three different manufacturers ("A", "B" and "C"). These components were subjected to prior spectrum load fatigue testing in order to qualify an alternate source. Manufacturer "A" was the current source, and this testing was performed to compare the results of "B" and "C" versus "A". The "C" components exhibited only half the fatigue resistance of the "A" and "B" components. Upon dimensional examination by ARL, it was determined that the root radius of an "A" and "C" rod did not conform to the governing requirements. Although the surface roughness of the parts from each manufacturer varied, all readings met the governing requirement. Hardness results differed only slightly between the rods, however, the tensile properties (of coupons sectioned from the original rods) were significantly different. Nevertheless, the hardness and tensile results met the minimum requirements specified. The results of fatigue testing (of coupons sectioned from the original rods) showed a dramatic difference between the rods. Metallography was utilized to examine the microstructure and grain size. The structure of each rod was consistent with the prior treatment, and the grain size met the governing requirement. The amount of delta (free) ferrite within the structure varied slightly from rod to rod, but was well witin the specified limits. Banding was more prevalent witin the "C" material than the "A" and "B" material. The threads of each rod were examined metallographically, since this was the area of failure as a result of the spectrum load fatigue testing. Although differences in the surface profile of the threads from the different manufacturers was noted, there was no evidence of gross abnormalities such as tear out or chatter. The chemical analysis of each rod varied, but each composition met the governing requirements.
机译:美国陆军航空与部队司令部(ATCOM)委托美国陆军研究实验室(ARL)对三个不同制造商的用沉淀硬化(PH)13-8 Mo不锈钢制成的主转子主轴组件固定杆进行冶金检查。 (“ A”,“ B”和“ C”)。这些组件已进行了事先的频谱负载疲劳测试,以便确定备用电源。制造商“ A”是当前的来源,并且进行了该测试以比较“ B”和“ C”与“ A”的结果。 “ C”组分的抗疲劳性仅是“ A”和“ B”组分的一半。通过ARL进行尺寸检查后,确定“ A”和“ C”杆的根部半径不符合管理要求。尽管每个制造商的零件的表面粗糙度各不相同,但所有读数均符合控制要求。杆之间的硬度结果仅略有不同,但是(从原始杆上切下的试样的)拉伸性能有显着差异。尽管如此,硬度和拉伸结果仍符合规定的最低要求。疲劳测试的结果(从原始杆上切下来的试样)显示出杆之间的巨大差异。金相学用于检查组织和晶粒尺寸。每根棒的结构与先前的处理一致,并且晶粒尺寸满足控制要求。棒内的组织中的δ(游离)铁素体的数量随棒的不同而略有不同,但在规定的范围内是很好的。在“ C”材料中,条带比“ A”和“ B”材料中的条带更为普遍。对每个杆的螺纹进行金相检查,因为这是频谱载荷疲劳测试的结果,是失效的区域。尽管注意到不同制造商生产的线的表面轮廓有所不同,但没有证据表明存在明显的异常现象,例如撕裂或颤动。每个棒的化学分析各不相同,但每种成分均满足管理要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号