【24h】

Object Orientation Fallacies

机译:物件定向谬论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

At the beginning, no formal strategy was followed and so some researchers proposed a standard way for developing a system, usually called a methodology. In recent years, many expectations were created because of the increasing adoption of methodologies based on the Object Orientation (OO) paradigm. It seemed like a silver bullet that would solve all problems from application development. But which of the benefits stated by its defenders were true? In the present paper an analysis of this paradigm will be presented, based on our experience with real world applications in Brazil. What are the greatest obstacles faced to adopt an OO methodology as for example - Unified Process? Another point studied will be Functions versus Methods, what are the advantages and disadvantages? Also, are all other models from Unified Modeling used in practice or people just go ahead without them? Finally, a discussion about where should reside the business rules, in a persistence layer, inside a database, or in both places? And what about OO databases, are they really used? Our objective is to provoke the audience to think about the benefits and costs of adopting a new technology and discarding the previous one.
机译:起初,没有遵循正式的策略,因此一些研究人员提出了开发系统的标准方法,通常称为方法论。近年来,由于越来越多地采用基于对象定向(OO)范式的方法,因此产生了许多期望。似乎可以解决应用程序开发中的所有问题的灵丹妙药。但是,其辩护人所说的哪些好处是正确的?在本文中,将基于我们在巴西实际应用中的经验,对这种范例进行分析。采用OO方法(例如统一过程)面临的最大障碍是什么?研究的另一点将是“功能与方法”,优点和缺点是什么?另外,实践中是否使用了Unified Modeling的所有其他模型,还是人们没有它们就继续前进?最后,讨论在持久层,数据库内部或在这两个位置中应将业务规则驻留在何处?那么,OO数据库真的被使用了吗?我们的目标是激发观众考虑采用新技术并放弃旧技术的收益和成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号