首页> 外文会议>2018 4th International Conference on Computing Communication and Automation >Automatic Reviewers Assignment to a Research Paper Based on Allied References and Publications Weight
【24h】

Automatic Reviewers Assignment to a Research Paper Based on Allied References and Publications Weight

机译:基于相关参考文献和出版物权重的自动审稿人分配给研究论文

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Everyday there may be a vast stream of research documents give in to conferences, anthologies, journals, newsletters, annual report, daily paper, and different periodicals. Numerous such publications use unbiased and exterior specialists to survey. This methodology is frequently termed peer review, in addition the assessors are named referees. but it is not always possible to pick out the best referee for reviewing. Moreover, the new fields of research are emerging in every sector and the number of research is increasing dramatically. but, to review all of these papers, every journal assign a short team of referees and maybe they are not expert in all areas. For example, a research paper in the communication technology area should be reviewed by the expert from the same field. So, it is a big challenge to efficiently select the best reviewer or referee for a research paper. In this research work, we proposed and implemented a program or software where, we used a new strategy to select the best reviewers of a research work automatically. As we already know that every research paper contains references in the end of the paper and the references are generally from same area as the paper is. In this work, first of all, we collect the references and count the authors who have at least one paper that belong to the reference section. Once, we collect the authors name, automatically browse the web to extract the research topic keywords. Then again search for finding top researchers in the specific topic field and count their h-index, i10-index and citations for first n author. After then, ranked top n authors based on ranking score and automatically browse their homepage to retrieve emails address. We also check their co-authors and colleagues from the web and discard them accordingly from the list. The remaining tops n authors (researcher) generally professor and maybe the best referees for reviewing a research paper.
机译:每天可能会有大量的研究文件提供给会议,选集,期刊,新闻通讯,年度报告,日报和不同的期刊。许多此类出版物都使用不偏不倚的外部专家进行调查。这种方法通常被称为同行评审,此外,评估者被称为裁判。但并非总是能挑选出最好的裁判进行审查。而且,新的研究领域正在各个领域涌现,研究的数量正在急剧增加。但是,要审阅所有这些论文,每个期刊都会分配一小队裁判,也许他们并不是所有领域的专家。例如,通信技术领域的研究论文应由同一领域的专家审阅。因此,有效地选择研究论文的最佳审稿人或审稿人是一个巨大的挑战。在这项研究工作中,我们提出并实施了一个程序或软件,在其中我们使用了一种新策略来自动选择研究工作的最佳评论者。我们已经知道,每篇研究论文的末尾都有参考文献,这些参考文献通常与论文来自同一领域。在这项工作中,首先,我们收集参考文献,并对至少有一篇属于该参考文献的论文的作者进行计数。一次,我们收集作者姓名,自动浏览网络以提取研究主题关键字。然后再次搜索以找到特定主题领域的顶尖研究人员,并计算他们的h指数,i10指数和前n位作者的引文。之后,根据排名得分排在前n位的作者,并自动浏览其主页以检索电子邮件地址。我们还会从网上检查他们的合著者和同事,并从列表中相应地将其丢弃。其余的前n位作者(研究员)通常是教授,并且可能是审阅研究论文的最佳裁判。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号