首页> 外文会议>43rd Forum on Geology of Industrial Minerals 2007 >Industrial Minerals Reserves and Resources Classification and Evaluation
【24h】

Industrial Minerals Reserves and Resources Classification and Evaluation

机译:工业矿产储量和资源分类与评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The key parts of the definition of a mineral reserve are that it is (a) that part of a deposit that can be recovered and sold (geology, mining, and process engineering), (b) is economically (profitably) extractable (market), and (c) is legally extractable (title and permits), as demonstrated at the time the reserve estimate is made. The classification of mineral reserves and mineral resources from the JORC and similar codes is compared with the SEC's Industry Guide 7, which doesn't recognize the mineral resources categories but does recognize "mineralized material," which is equivalent to the sum of the measured and indicated resources of the JORC and similar codes. The SEC's objection to "resources" stems from the word's similarity to "reserves," the fact that the mining industry's use of these terms is the reverse of common English usage, and that resource estimates allow too much latitude for flights of promotional fancy.rnBecause reserves are net of mining and processing losses and resources are in-situ estimates, they should not be mixed. Further, because initial estimates of deposit size generally exceed the economically recoverable and saleable quantity, often by a substantial amount, resource estimates, particularly those made early in a projects life, may be misleadingly optimistic.rnBoth the JORC and similar codes and Industry Guide 7 share some common assumptions. First, they recognize a "blue sky" boundary, a line beyond which estimates of tonnage and grade are too speculative to meet required degrees of assured existence. However, the location of this boundary varies between classification systems. They also include two assumptions that do not apply to industrial minerals; that geology presents the greatest risk in deposit delineation and evaluation and that if you produce a quantity of product (e.g. an ounce of gold or pound of copper) you can sell it. Internationally, there are differing views about whether reserves are part of or separate from the resource base. Defining the boundaries between the categories of resources and reserves conceptually would appear to be a problematic area. In practice, this is seldom the case.rnThe detail and reliability of the mining, processing, environmental, marketing, and other factors required to support a reserve estimate should be very high. Completed full feasibility (bankable feasibility) or reasonably detailed mine plans covering the extraction of all estimated reserves are required by the SEC. Canadian National Instrument 43-101 has less strict feasibility requirements.
机译:矿产储量定义的关键部分是(a)可回收和出售的一部分矿藏(地质,采矿和过程工程),(b)可经济(有利可图)开采(市场) ,并且(c)可合法提取(所有权和许可证),如在进行储量估算时所证明的那样。将JORC和类似法规中的矿产储量和矿产资源分类与SEC的《行业指南7》进行比较,该指南无法识别矿产资源类别,但可以识别“矿物质”,这相当于所测得矿产和矿物总和。 JORC和类似代码的指示资源。 SEC反对“资源”的原因是该词与“储备”的相似之处,即采矿业对这些术语的使用与普通英语用法相反,并且资源估计为促销活动提供了很大的自由度。储备金已扣除采矿和加工损失,资源是就地估算,因此不应混为一谈。此外,由于对存款规模的初步估计通常会超过经济上可收回和可出售的数量,通常超过相当数量,因此资源估计,尤其是在项目生命周期早期进行的估计可能会产生误导性。rnJORC和类似法规以及行业指南7有一些共同的假设。首先,他们认识到“蓝天”的边界,在该边界之外,吨位和坡度的估算太具有投机性,无法满足所需的保证存在度。但是,此边界的位置在分类系统之间有所不同。它们还包括两个不适用于工业矿物的假设。地质条件会给定金和定值带来最大的风险,如果您生产一定数量的产品(例如一盎司的黄金或一磅的铜),则可以出售。在国际上,关于储备金是资源库的一部分还是与资源库分开的观点不同。从概念上界定资源和储备类别之间的界限似乎是一个有问题的领域。实际上,这种情况很少发生。采矿,加工,环境,销售以及支持储量估算所需的其他因素的细节和可靠性应该很高。 SEC要求完成完整的可行性研究(可银行可行性研究)或涵盖所有估计储量提取的合理详细的矿山计划。加拿大国家仪器43-101具有不太严格的可行性要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号