【24h】

Performance analysis of IPv4/IPv6 transition techniques

机译:IPv4 / IPv6过渡技术的性能分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

IPv4 and IPv6 protocol are incompatible due to their different header structure; therefore no direct communication exists between them. For the two protocol to coexist, IETF proposed three possible solutions; Dual Stack, translation and tunnelling. This paper evaluates the performance of tunnelling and dual stack as they are the most deployed techniques. 6to4, ISATAP and 6RD were the three automatic tunnelling techniques protocol analysed. Native IPv6 and IPv4 were also examined so as to be able to observe the improvement brought by IPv6 and compare the result of IPv6 with the transition techniques. The experiment uses different measurements such as round trip time (RTT), throughput, packet loss and CPU utilisation for performance analysis. Using GNS3 as the emulator, all the configurations were implemented according to specific sets of configuration commands. The results from the testbed were used to generate the performance graphs and charts. This paper shows that Dual Stack and 6RD are better transition techniques.
机译:IPv4和IPv6协议的标头结构不同,因此不兼容;因此,它们之间不存在直接通信。为了使两种协议共存,IETF提出了三种可能的解决方案:双堆栈,转换和隧道化。本文评估了隧道技术和双堆栈技术(它们是最常用的技术)的性能。 6to4,ISATAP和6RD是分析的三种自动隧道技术协议。还检查了本地IPv6和IPv4,以便能够观察到IPv6带来的改进,并将IPv6的结果与过渡技术进行比较。该实验使用诸如往返时间(RTT),吞吐量,数据包丢失和CPU利用率之类的不同度量进行性能分析。使用GNS3作为仿真器,所有配置都是根据特定的配置命令集实现的。测试台的结果用于生成性能图和图表。本文表明,双堆栈和6RD是更好的过渡技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号