首页> 外文会议>2012 IEEE/IPSJ 12th International Symposium on Applications and the Internet >Extraction and Annotation of Personal Cliques from Social Networks
【24h】

Extraction and Annotation of Personal Cliques from Social Networks

机译:从社交网络中提取和注释个人集团

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In microblogging services such as Twitter, users can choose whose posts they want to read by "following" other user accounts. Twitter users often have large social networks, thus many of them are overwhelmed with managing their network connections and dealing with information overload. We want to address this problem by automatically dividing the social network of a Twitter user into personal cliques, and annotating each clique with keywords to identify the common ground of a clique. Our proposed clique annotation method extracts keywords from the tweet history of the clique members and individually weights the extracted keywords of each clique member according to the relevance of their tweets for the clique. The keyword weight is influenced by two factors. The first factor is calculated based on the number of connections of a user within the clique, and the second factor depends on whether the user mainly publishes personal information or information of general interest. In an experiment, on average 36.25% of the keywords extracted from our proposed method were relevant for the cliques, as opposed to 31.78% for the baseline method, which does not weight keywords but only calculates term frequency. When we annotated only cliques formed around common interests, such as "baseball", our proposed method even extracted 50.67% of relevant keywords, as opposed to 42% for the baseline method. These results clearly indicate that our approach can improve clique annotation in social networks.
机译:在Twitter等微博客服务中,用户可以通过“跟随”其他用户帐户来选择要阅读的帖子。 Twitter用户通常拥有大型社交网络,因此许多人不堪管理网络连接并处理信息过载。我们想通过自动将Twitter用户的社交网络划分为个人团体并用关键字注释每个团体以标识团体的共同点来解决此问题。我们提出的集团注释方法从集团成员的推文历史中提取关键字,并根据每个集团成员的推文与集团的相关性分别对提取的关键字进行加权。关键字权重受两个因素影响。第一个因素是根据集团内用户的联系数量计算的,第二个因素取决于用户主要发布个人信息还是普遍关注的信息。在实验中,从我们提出的方法中提取的关键字平均有36.25%与集团相关,而基线方法只有31.78%与基线相关,基准方法不对关键字进行加权,而仅计算词频。当我们仅注释围绕诸如“棒球”之类的共同利益形成的集团时,我们提出的方法甚至提取了50.67%的相关关键字,而基线方法为42%。这些结果清楚地表明,我们的方法可以改善社交网络中的集团注释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号