首页> 外文会议>2008 China international conference in finance >CORPORATE FRAUD AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS: EVIDENCE FROM IPOS
【24h】

CORPORATE FRAUD AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS: EVIDENCE FROM IPOS

机译:公司欺诈和业务状况:来自IPOS的证据

获取原文

摘要

Using a sample of firms that went public between 1995 and 2002, we examine whether a firm's incentive to commit fraud when raising external capital varies with investor beliefs about industry business conditions as predicted by Povel, Singh and Winton (2007). We document a concave relationship between fraud propensity and optimism in investor beliefs. A firm is more likely to commit fraud when investors are more optimistic about the firm's industry prospect. Nevertheless, the probability of fraud decreases in the presence of extreme investor optimism, as the firm is able to obtain funding without misrepresenting information to outside investors. We also find evidence that venture capitalists and underwriters have different monitoring incentives. When venture capitalists are present, fraud is less likely for low investor beliefs but more likely for high investor beliefs; this suggests that venture capitalists primarily monitor to seek good returns for their investment and thus take investor beliefs into account. By contrast, underwriters' monitoring choices appear to be more concerned with preventing fraud per se so as to protect their reputations. These findings are consistent with the predictions from Povel, Singh and Winton (2007).
机译:通过对1995年至2002年间上市公司的样本进行调查,我们考察了Povel,Singh和Winton(2007)预测的,投资者在筹集外部资本时进行欺诈的动机是否随投资者对行业商业状况的信念而变化。我们记录了欺诈倾向与投资者信念中的乐观之间的隐秘关系。当投资者对公司的行业前景更加乐观时,公司更有可能犯下欺诈罪。然而,在极端乐观的投资者面前,欺诈的可能性降低了,因为该公司能够获得资金而不会向外部投资者歪曲信息。我们还发现有证据表明,风险资本家和承销商具有不同的监督激励措施。当风险资本家在场时,欺诈的可能性较小,而投资者信心低下,但欺诈的可能性更大,投资者信心高。这表明,风险资本家主要是为了寻求良好的投资回报而进行监督,从而考虑到投资者的信念。相比之下,承销商的监督选择似乎更关注于防止欺诈本身以保护其声誉。这些发现与Povel,Singh和Winton(2007)的预测一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号