【24h】

EXCESS STORAGE; UTILITIES' ACHILLES' HEEL

机译:储存过多;公用事业的脚跟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Historically, distribution storage has been designed with little or no regard to water quality concerns. The driving mechanism was strictly based on hydraulic issues such as pressures and flows, largely due to restrictions imposed for fire suppression and prevention, typically identified by the Insurance Services Office (ISO). Storage was also driven, in part, to provide the customer with assurances that the water supply would not be interrupted. Regulations such as the Total Coliform Rule (TCR), the Surface Water Treatment Rule, the THM Rule, etc., which can be impacted directly or indirectly by storage were not in place and as a result adverse effects from excessive storage often went unnoticed. Further, storage was and still is designed to be strategically located throughout the distribution system. Distribution systems however, are not static. Like the communities they serve, distribution systems change and evolve over time. What was once considered strategic, may no longer be the case for many systems. Therefore, there is a need to reevaluate distribution system storage capacity and location on a frequent ongoing basis.
机译:从历史上看,分配存储的设计很少或根本没有考虑水质问题。该驱动机制严格基于诸如压力和流量之类的液压问题,这在很大程度上是由于通常由保险服务办公室(ISO)确定的灭火和预防限制。还推动了存储的发展,部分目的是向客户保证供水不会中断。诸如总大肠菌素规则(TCR),地表水处理规则,THM规则等法规可能没有受到存储直接或间接的影响,因此,通常不会注意到过度存储带来的不利影响。此外,过去和现在都将存储设计为在整个分发系统中具有战略意义。但是,分配系统不是静态的。就像他们服务的社区一样,分配系统会随着时间的推移而变化和发展。曾经被认为是战略性的东西,对于许多系统而言可能不再适用。因此,需要经常不断地重新评估分配系统的存储容量和位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号