首页> 外文会议>17th World Congress on Ergonomics(第十七届国际人类工效学大会)论文集 >The effectiveness of ergonomic workplace interventions on low back pain and neck pain; a systematic review
【24h】

The effectiveness of ergonomic workplace interventions on low back pain and neck pain; a systematic review

机译:符合人体工程学的工作场所干预对腰痛和颈痛的有效性;系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Both low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) are major occupational health problems with considerable consequences for workers, employers, and society. Ergonomic interventions (physical and organisational) aim to prevent or reduce LBP and NP among workers. We conducted a systematic review of these RCTs. The databases of Pubmed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Occupational Health Field were checked from September 1988 to September 2008. Two reviewers independently screened 3067 abstracts and assessed the risk of bias of 10 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria. Subsequently, data were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed. Levels of evidence were classified using the GRADE system. Seven RCTs had a low risk and three a high risk of bias. The results showed low to moderate quality evidence that physical and organisational ergonomic interventions were not more effective than no ergonomic intervention on short and long term LBP and NP incidence/prevalence, short and long term LBP intensity, and short term NP intensity. There was low quality evidence that a physical ergonomic intervention (e.g. arm board) was significantly more effective on the reduction of NP intensity at the long term than no ergonomic intervention. The results, however, cannot be generalised towards all working populations. Furthermore, most other studies were on NP, conducted among office workers and evaluated workstation adjustments. Moreover, the number of studies was limited, and populations, interventions, controls and outcomes were heterogeneous.
机译:下背痛(LBP)和颈部疼痛(NP)都是主要的职业健康问题,对工人,雇主和社会都有相当大的影响。人体工程学干预(身体和组织)旨在防止或减少工人的LBP和NP。我们对这些RCT进行了系统的审查。从1988年9月至2008年9月,检查了Pubmed,EMBASE,PsychINFO,CENTRAL和Cochrane职业卫生领域的数据库。两名审阅者独立筛选了3067篇摘要,并评估了10项符合纳入标准的RCT的偏倚风险。随后,提取数据,并进行荟萃分析。证据等级使用GRADE系统分类。七个RCT的风险低,三个偏见的风险高。结果表明,中低质量的证据表明,在短期和长期LBP和NP发生率/患病率,短期和长期LBP强度以及短期NP强度方面,物理和组织人体工程学干预措施没有比没有人体工程学干预措施更有效。有低质量的证据表明,从长远来看,物理人体工程学干预(例如手臂板)在降低NP强度方面比没有人体工程学干预显着更有效。但是,结果不能推广到所有工作人群。此外,大多数其他研究是关于NP,是在办公室工作人员中进行的,并评估了工作站的调整情况。而且,研究的数量是有限的,并且人群,干预措施,控制和结果是异质的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号