首页> 外文会议>12th Americas Conference on Information Systems(AMCIS 2006) vol.2 >What makes an Innovation Radical? Finding the 'radicalness' in radical innovation adoption
【24h】

What makes an Innovation Radical? Finding the 'radicalness' in radical innovation adoption

机译:是什么使创新激进?在根本性创新采用中找到“根基”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study explores the factors that contribute towards the perception of an innovation as radical by its adopters. This paper addresses an important conceptual gap in the innovation literature by identifying the attributes which make an innovation radical. Prior conceptualizations of radicalness have been useful but incomplete and have often assumed that term "radicalness of an innovation" is clearly understood and means the same for all managers. This however may be far from truth. The same innovation may be characterized as radical by different managers for very different underlying reasons and it may even be characterized as incremental (very low on radicalness scale) by others. For the practitioner this lack of definitional clarity means not being able to understand the inherent attributes of radicalness and not being able to effectively develop or respond to radical innovations. More over from the theoretical and academic perspective, it becomes difficult to aggregate results from different studies which leads to ambiguity in understanding and explaining the effects of radicalness on adoption and implementation decisions and outcomes. We argue that technology radicalness is better understood and measured as a formative construct with four critical sub dimensions (Amount/extent of new knowledge, nature of concept change, nature of component change, nature of linkage change) each of which contribute to the degree of perceived radicalness of a technology.
机译:这项研究探索了导致采用创新者将创新视为根本的因素。本文通过确定使创新成为根本的属性,解决了创新文献中的一个重要概念鸿沟。先前关于激进性的概念是有用的,但并不完整,并且经常假设“创新的激进性”一词已被清楚地理解,并且对所有管理者而言都是相同的。但是,这可能与事实相去甚远。出于不同的根本原因,同一创新可能被不同的经理形容为激进的,而其他人甚至可能将其等同为渐进式的(激进程度非常低)。对于从业者而言,缺乏定义上的明确性意味着无法理解激进性的内在属性,也无法有效地发展或应对激进性创新。此外,从理论和学术角度看,要汇总来自不同研究的结果变得困难,这导致在理解和解释激进性对采用和实施决策以及结果的影响方面存在歧义。我们认为,技术激进性可以更好地理解和衡量为具有四个关键子维度(新知识的数量/范围,概念变更的性质,组件变更的性质,链接变更的性质)的形成性构造,而这四个维度分别对感知技术的根本性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号