首页> 外文会议>10th EMAS regional workshop on electron probe microanalysis of materials today : Practical aspects >IDENTIFICATION OF STEEL PHASES AND CONSTITUENTS BY COMBINED EBSD AND HIGH RESOLUTION EPMA CARBON MEASUREMENTS
【24h】

IDENTIFICATION OF STEEL PHASES AND CONSTITUENTS BY COMBINED EBSD AND HIGH RESOLUTION EPMA CARBON MEASUREMENTS

机译:EBSD和高分辨率EPMA碳测量相结合来识别钢相和成分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The mechanical properties of multiphase steels depend on various factors such as the composition, fraction of the different phases/constituents and internal strain level. Precise measurements are required to understand steel behaviours as well as to establish reliable prediction models. In this project, EBSD and EPMA measurements are combined to obtain a complete characterisation of dual phase and TRIP steel samples as well as to overcome some ambiguities encountered when only one of these two techniques is used. SEM images after chemical etching are also performed to validate the results. EBSD can easily differentiate ferrite and austenite grains based on their crystallographic difference. However, the lattice deviations between ferrite, bainite and martensite are too small to be indexed as different phases. As reported by many authors including Ryde, ferrite and martensite can be differentiated based on the quality of the diffraction patterns. Despite its dependence on the crystal orientation, the diffraction quality is predominantly reduced by the crystallographic defects in martensite. This segmentation is further confirmed by EPMA where martensite regions have a carbon concentration of between 0.8 - 1.2 wt% in the measured samples. The discrimination between ferrite and bainite using the diffraction quality method is, however, more ambiguous. Zaefferer et al. utilized the higher concentration of dislocations in bainite, measured using the kernel average misorientation (KAM), to segment out bainitic regions from ferrite grains. However, in dual phase steels, potential ferritic regions with high density of transformation induced dislocations near martensite islands complicate the identification of bainite. Both have high local misorientation. High resolution carbon mapping performed with a FEG microprobe can resolve this ambiguity. Bainite can be identified as regions of high misorientation values containing carbon, whereas dislocation regions will have a carbon content similar to that in ferrite grains. A further complication is the presence of pearlite, as this constituent also exhibits higher KAM values and carbon level than ferrite. As the internal structure of pearlite cannot be distinguished in a microprobe, the measured carbon concentration is a mixture of the one of ferrite and cementite based on the lamellae spacing. This illustrates the need of sensitive EPMA measurements to distinguish small carbon variation between pearlite and bainite structures. Strategies must be developed to maximize counting statistics while reducing the effects of contamination and topography, and maintaining a good spatial resolution.
机译:多相钢的机械性能取决于各种因素,例如组成,不同相/成分的分数和内部应变水平。需要精确的测量来了解钢的行为以及建立可靠的预测模型。在该项目中,将EBSD和EPMA测量结合起来以获得双相和TRIP钢样品的完整表征,并克服了仅使用这两种技术中的一种时遇到的歧义。还执行化学蚀刻后的SEM图像以验证结果。 EBSD可根据其晶体学差异轻松区分铁素体和奥氏体晶粒。但是,铁素体,贝氏体和马氏体之间的晶格偏差太小,无法索引为不同的相。正如包括莱德(Ryde)在内的许多学者所报道的,铁素体和马氏体可以根据衍射图的质量来区分。尽管它依赖于晶体取向,但是由于马氏体中的晶体学缺陷,衍射质量主要降低。 EPMA进一步证实了这种分割,其中在测量样品中马氏体区域的碳浓度为0.8-1.2 wt%。然而,使用衍射质量方法对铁素体和贝氏体的区分更加模糊。 Zaefferer等。利用核平均失取向(KAM)测量的贝氏体中较高的位错浓度从铁素体晶粒中分离出贝氏体区域。然而,在双相钢中,马氏体岛附近具有高相变密度诱发位错的潜在铁素体区域使贝氏体的鉴定复杂化。两者都具有较高的局部取向错误。用FEG微探针进行高分辨率碳制图可以解决这种歧义。贝氏体可以识别为含碳的高失取向值区域,而位错区域的碳含量与铁素体晶粒中的碳含量相似。珠光体的存在是另一个问题,因为该成分还比铁素体具有更高的KAM值和碳含量。由于无法通过微探针区分珠光体的内部结构,因此基于薄片间距,测得的碳浓度是铁素体和渗碳体之一的混合物。这说明需要灵敏的EPMA测量值来区分珠光体和贝氏体结构之间的微小碳变化。必须制定策略以最大化计数统计数据,同时减少污染和地形的影响,并保持良好的空间分辨率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号