...
首页> 外文期刊>Sequential analysis >Is Average Run Length To False Alarm Always An Informative Criterion?
【24h】

Is Average Run Length To False Alarm Always An Informative Criterion?

机译:错误警报的平均游程长度是否始终是信息准则?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Apart from Bayesian approaches, the average run length (ARL) to false alarm has always been seen as the natural performance criterion for quantifying the propensity of a detection scheme to make false alarms, and no researchers seem to have questioned this on grounds that it does not always apply. In this article, we show that in the change-point problem with mixture prechange models, detection schemes with finite detection delays can have infinite ARLs to false alarm. We also discuss the implication of our results on the change-point problem with either exchangeable prechange models or hidden Markov models. Alternative minimax formulations with different false alarm criteria are proposed.
机译:除了贝叶斯方法外,错误警报的平均运行时间(ARL)一直被视为量化检测方案制造错误警报倾向的自然性能标准,并且似乎没有研究者对此提出质疑。并不总是适用。在本文中,我们证明了在具有混合预变更模型的变更点问题中,具有有限检测延迟的检测方案可能具有无限个误报警ARL。我们还讨论了可交换的预转换模型或隐马尔可夫模型对转换点问题的影响。提出了具有不同误报标准的替代性maxmax公式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号