首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience >Sensitivity to Vocalization Pitch in the Caudal Auditory Cortex of the Marmoset: Comparison of Core and Belt Areas
【2h】

Sensitivity to Vocalization Pitch in the Caudal Auditory Cortex of the Marmoset: Comparison of Core and Belt Areas

机译:mo猴尾部听觉皮层发声音高的敏感性:核心区和带区的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Based on anatomical connectivity and basic response characteristics, primate auditory cortex is divided into a central core surrounded by belt and parabelt regions. The encoding of pitch, a prototypical element of sound identity, has been studied in primary auditory cortex (A1) but little is known about how it is encoded and represented beyond A1. The caudal auditory belt and parabelt cortical fields process spatial information but also contain information on non-spatial aspects of sounds. In this study, we examined neuronal responses in these areas to pitch-varied marmoset vocalizations, to derive the consequent representation of pitch in these regions and the potential underlying mechanisms, to compare to the encoding and representation of pitch of the same sounds in A1. With respect to response patterns to the vocalizations, neurons in caudal medial belt (CM) showed similar short-latency and short-duration response patterns to A1, but caudal lateral belt (CL) neurons at the same hierarchical level and caudal parabelt (CPB) neurons at a higher hierarchical level showed delayed or much delayed response onset and prolonged response durations. With respect to encoding of pitch, neurons in all cortical fields showed sensitivity to variations in the vocalization pitch either through modulation of spike-count or of first spike-latency. The utility of the encoding mechanism differed between fields: pitch sensitivity was reliably represented by spike-count variations in A1 and CM, while first spike-latency variation was better for encoding pitch in CL and CPB. In summary, our data show that (a) the traditionally-defined belt area CM is functionally very similar to A1 with respect to the representation and encoding of complex naturalistic sounds, (b) the CL belt area, at the same hierarchical level as CM, and the CPB area, at a higher hierarchical level, have very different response patterns and appear to use different pitch-encoding mechanisms, and (c) caudal auditory fields, proposed to be specialized for encoding spatial location, can also contain robust representations of sound identity.
机译:根据解剖学上的连通性和基本的响应特征,灵长类听觉皮层被分为由腰带和副带区域包围的中央核心。在主要听觉皮层(A1)中已经研究了音调的编码,这是声音识别的原型元素,但对如何编码和表示超出A1的了解甚少。尾部听觉带和副带皮层场处理空间信息,但也包含声音的非空间方面的信息。在这项研究中,我们检查了这些区域中对变调mar猴发声的神经反应,以得出这些区域中变调的结果表示以及潜在的潜在机制,以与A1中相同声音的变调的编码和表示进行比较。关于发声的反应模式,尾内侧带(CM)中的神经元显示出与A1相似的短时延和短时响应模式,但尾侧外侧带(CL)神经元处于相同的等级水平,且尾部副带(CPB)较高级别的神经元显示出延迟的反应延迟或延迟较大的反应持续时间。关于音调的编码,所有皮质区域中的神经元都通过调制尖峰计数或第一尖峰潜伏期对发声音高变化表现出敏感性。编码机制的用途在各个字段之间有所不同:音调灵敏度由A1和CM中的尖峰计数变化可靠地表示,而第一个尖峰延迟变化对于在CL和CPB中编码音调更好。总而言之,我们的数据表明,(a)传统定义的腰带区域CM在功能上非常类似于A1,表示和编码复杂的自然主义声音;(b)CL腰带区域,与CM处于同一层次级别,并且CPB区域在较高的层次上具有非常不同的响应模式,并且似乎使用了不同的音高编码机制,并且(c)建议专门用于编码空间位置的尾部听觉场也可以包含以下项的可靠表示形式:健全的身份。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号